The prolonged turbulence in the world order driven by shifting geopolitics, has given countries and their leaders enough evidence that dominance no longer works in today's era whether it is the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the US-Israel-Iran conflict or China's pursuit of expanding its sphere of influence.
History offers strong evidence of how even a slight weakness in a dominant power can lead to the collapse of its entire empire.
The British Empire, the Roman Empire, and the Mongols all operated on a model of dominance they extracted resources, imposed rule and suppressed dissent.
Even the most dominant leaders eventually met collapse by their own people.
Today's dominant powers are trying to shape world order through war, tariffs, and even control of technology to dominate others and this is breeding long-term uncertainty that ripples through economies, trade, inflation and even people as no country is truly isolated anymore due to globalization.
Modern global trade is the ultimate collaborative network and it needs to stay that way.
Even the allies of dominant powers across the Middle East and the EU have gathered enough evidence to erode their trust in and reliance on the dominator and are now shifting gears rapidly.
Ukraine and Iran have shown the world that determination outlasts power, no matter how strong the dominator is. When people are determined to fight for survival, they will do whatever it takes to the very last breath and history shows that this kind of resolve wins over dominance in the long run.
Leaders who grasp this early will become collaborators. I already see signs that the Ukraine-Russia conflict could settle in the near term perhaps within the next six months and the one playing the role of peacemaker is not a dominator but a collaborator. You can probably guess recent remarks from External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar point clearly in that direction.
Some dominators, however will never grasp this, because to them, settlement looks like weakness. This is the dominance model: "I win only if you lose."
Even today, I wonder why Iran's leader was killed when he was already well into his later years to rest in peace a time when a natural transition of power, paired with continued diplomacy, could have resolved the long-running conflict on its own. Wouldn't the next leader would be better chance at negotiation as diplomacy was already running for long with current leader but without any break through ?
But someone's ego and a desire for revenge, dragged the dominator further into conflict instead.
Now Iran has even more evidence to tell its neighbors and world why they should become collaborators moving past religious differences and conflicts rather than trusting a dominator for their security and development.
The tectonic plates of power are shifting. The old playbook of zero-sum dominance is failing. We are entering an era of entangled complexity, where trades, systems, technologies, economies and societies are so deeply interconnected no single nation can solve problems alone hence the most successful nations will be those that master the art of collaboration.
Power is no longer defined by how much you can control, but by how many you can connect with.
The future of trade is not about tariffs, creating blocks for resources or be total self-sufficiency it is about interoperability.
The countries that thrive will be the ones that sign free trade agreements, harmonize regulations, and let capital, ideas, tech and talent flow freely.
Today, AI is being led by dominant powers so what happens when a dominator uses it as a weapon to impose rules and dictate terms ? Many world leaders has recognized this risk and want AI to flourish collaboratively, through open standards that ensure safety and equitable access.
Some nations are already investing in homegrown talent to build their own models. If this trend continues, the future of technological dominance could look completely different.
The most successful leaders today and in the future, will be connectors.
They understand that influence isn't about how many people you can command it's about how many people you can inspire to work with you.
The more a dominator pushes to dominate, the more the world will lean toward collaboration and that shift will steadily erode the dominator's trust, reliability, and economic standing.